Americans for Equal Opportunity — the anti-DEI outfit run by board president Clegg Ivey — has filed a new charge with the EEOC against Sponsors for Educational Opportunity, the nonprofit behind the legal industry’s largest diversity pipeline program, along with 14 law firms: Alston & Bird, Cooley, Covington & Burling, Cravath, Debevoise & Plimpton, Foley Hoag, Jones Day, Morgan Lewis, Patterson Belknap, Proskauer Rose, Quinn Emanuel, Wachtell, White & Case, and WilmerHale.
Back in May 2025, AEO hit SEO and 44 sponsor firms with its first EEOC charge, casting a program that placed roughly 200 incoming law students into paid summer positions each year as a “racially discriminatory hiring pipeline.” The results have been about what you’d expect — 17 of those 44 firms have since told the EEOC they no longer participate in the SEO Law Fellowship (a roster of the newly diversity-averse that reportedly includes Kirkland & Ellis, Gibson Dunn, Davis Polk, and Skadden).
The theory this time is that SEO’s Law Fellowship discriminates on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, and sexual orientation. Somewhere out there is a straight, white, American, Christian law student who allegedly can’t catch a break, and AEO would like the federal government to do something about it. And AEO isn’t just claiming SEO kept doing what it did before, it’s claiming SEO got sneaky about it. After explicit racial preferences became legally radioactive, the group alleges, SEO didn’t stop preferring, it just rebranded, swapping candid race-based language for neutral-sounding copy without changing anything else.
The original AEO charge leaned on Mansfield Rule Certification as its supposed smoking gun, citing the fact that 35 of the 44 sponsor firms were Mansfield certified as evidence of unlawful “quotas.” That’s the same Mansfield certification the FTC bullied out of existence with a legal argument a federal judge had already called out as baseless, a certification that, as Judge Beryl Howell noted, expressly imposed no hiring quotas at all. But still, Mansfield certification fell because the profession decided diversity wasn’t worth the aggravation.
We’ve watched this movie enough times to know how it ends. The EEOC sicced itself on 20 Biglaw firms over their diversity practices. The FTC followed with warning letters to 42 more. Firms that never got a letter scrubbed their affinity pages and axed DEI staff anyway, and corporate clients quietly retired the diversity mandates they used to swear by. The numbers show it: Biglaw diversity gains have slowed to a crawl in the most hostile environment for these programs in decades.
So, yeah, the pipeline was always going to be next. It’s a tidy little strategy, and it works — not because the legal theory holds up, but because it doesn’t have to. All it takes is a willing agency and a profession that keeps deciding, over and over, that the safest thing to do is nothing.
SEO, for its part, was founded during the civil rights movement to close opportunity gaps for students who didn’t inherit a Rolodex. In 2026, that apparently makes it a target.
The post The Anti-DEI Crowd Is Coming For The Biglaw Pipeline. Again. appeared first on Above the Law.